Navigating the intricacies of high court filings can be challenging, even for seasoned professionals. Small errors or oversights often lead to objections that can delay proceedings and complicate cases. This blog is part of a series that sheds light on the most common mistakes made in high court filings and the objections they trigger.
In each installment, we will explore five frequently encountered filing errors and provide insights into how these mistakes can be avoided or addressed. Whether you’re a legal practitioner or someone seeking to understand the nuances of court procedures, this series aims to equip you with practical knowledge to streamline the filing process and reduce potential setbacks.
Let’s delve into the top five objections covered in this post!
Objection No. 1 – “Service to be done at:- xxxxxx@xxxx”
This objection is raised when the filer does not service the petition/application. This objection can be addressed by providing in the petition, the proof of service on the email pointed out by the registry or on the mail id designated by the respondent.
Objection No. 2 – “Provision of law (under section 151 CPC) to be mentioned in the heading on page xxx.”
This is the objection raised by the registry concerning the application seeking exemption from filing certified true copies, the objection states that the applicable section 151 of CPC has to be specifically mentioned in the heading of the application. This is generally raised when the exact section is missed to be mentioned in the heading / subject of the application.
